What!
Was that what just ran across the message board? As I drove down
I-75 the big beautiful church’s electronic message board screamed
out those words. I almost stopped to make sure what I had just read.
I laughed out load as the message sunk in. Get God and get amnesia.
Would God really want me to forget my past? The past where I first
meet God forgotten, could it be? What anchor would I have? What
history would teach me who I am and from where I came? Would God
really ask that much of me if I was to follow him? Could God let me
forget my past as if it never happened? Where would Israel have been
if that was what God ask of them? How would we know God if we all
had our pasts erased? As the church strives to witness to a changing
world can we afford to use the tactics that have formed the
tradition of evangelism in this country? Our world is changing from
an explainable definable place into a chaotic and liquid ooze that
is impossible to predict. As more people know nothing of the
Christian God can we afford to teach them that the past that they
cherished is the price to enter our spiritual heaven?
Speaking to strangers
Our world has entered into an era where the church and its
influence on society are severely limited. Assumptions made in past
centuries no longer stand. Postmodernism has destroyed the quaint
controlled world that most of us grew up in. A result of this
destruction is a world that is pre-Christian. No longer can the
church claim to have any influence on our culture. More people than
ever know nothing of God or Christ. This loss of influence must
result in the church understanding her mission to reach out to a
searching world in a different light. Those of us who claim to be
followers of Christ need to rethink how we help others in the
transition from unbelieving to believing.
With the changes that engulf our world more people than ever will
be coming to faith from a place that knows nothing about the history
of God. We can no longer assume that people who seek God have a
background that is based in Christian tradition or understanding. As
people come into relationship with Christ later in life the
intensity of their transition from self-focused to Christ focused
will be overwhelming. The church must allow these new followers to
mourn the lives they leave behind. If we are to enable people to
experience the transforming power of God in their lives we must find
a way to help them make the shift from an old way of being into a
new way.
As a leader in the church and a person that came to faith later
in life I must see the transition made by a new follower as a
traumatic event. For too long the church has required people to
ignore and forget their past lives once they accept the challenge of
Christ. The damage that the church has inflicted upon multitudes may
never be known. We can’t deny the pain that is involved for a mature
person to leave a world in which they have invested everything.
Salvation is not free and we must understand the costs of
conversion. The focus of the church-when a person is transformed-is
in most cases one of joy. This is an appropriate reaction. Yet, the
church has a history of denying any mourning or sense of loss on the
part of the person being changed. William Bridges in his book,
Transitions, describes a process
of transition that is foreign to the church’s understanding of
conversion.
“Endings, The Neutral Zone and New Beginnings” are the stages
Bridges describes as essential to any person’s successful transition
from on reality to another. It is clear from Bridges research and
experience that this process is part of how God created us. Each one
of us needs to allow ourselves a period of change when we transition
from one way of living to another. My experience in the church with
conversions has been a one-dimensional understanding. Nowhere is
space allowed for the process Bridges describes.
When a person is transformed and accepts the call of Christ they
have to change everything. This transition is even more intense in
our pre-Christian postmodern world. Our culture sees faith and
especially Christian faith as cult like in nature. When a person
becomes a follower of Christ and has come from a non-faith life
experience every aspect of their existence will be effected. As a
person helping someone through this transition I must be able to see
it in the way Bridges articulates.
The “endings” that a person has to endure will be powerful. There
will be intimate relationships that will be strained at best and
lost at worst. There will be careers that may end or change. There
will be family relationships that may not withstand the change.
There will be internal struggles that may overwhelm the person.
These are all real and profound results of the conversion process.
The church as people who will live through this transition with
those involved must be willing to allow a time of mourning. Christ
asks us to sacrifice everything in our following and we must be able
to see the cost involved. Too often the focus of the people helping
someone be “saved”, is to ignore and suppress the pain the person is
feeling. My conversion was at times more painful than it needed to
be because many of the people who were helping “save” me did not see
the need to allow the process of transition to be fulfilled. I must
be willing to use my experience to inform my actions with those I
will help through this transition. A person who accepts Christ must
be allowed to work through the costs. If that person is not allowed
time and reflection on what has been lost their transformation may
never be complete.
When we in the church force people to see their pasts as a
negative experience we risk destroying the work of God. God uses the
experiences we have in our lives to teach ourselves and others the
truth of who he is. For the church to teach people that there is
nothing of value in the person they were before their conversion
contradicts the fact that all people are created in God’s image.
Yes, the place that was called home was a place that would lead to
death but there was still value there. Most people will take a long
and sometimes difficult road to God. This journey will have many
turns that lead away from God and back to where we came. Helping
people to see the value of their old lives and that God can use the
things they learned there will allow them to fully embrace God.
The next phase according to Bridges is the “the Neutral Zone.”
Bridges gives an image of emptiness as the embodiment of this place.
The place where you struggle with the loss of what you once valued
is the place where we can be most needed. If we use this time as a
judgment on what the person used to be we risk pushing them back to
their old life. The disciples questioned who Jesus was even when he
appeared to them after his resurrection. We must see their
questioning as a desire for the life they left. Doubt about the
truth of Christ’s claims filled their minds. He had asked them to
leave everything behind to follow him and now he was upping the
ante. This is the same doubt and questioning we have all faced as we
transitioned from a life of death into a life of purpose. This is
the place where we question the decisions we have made. Was the
price to high? Was it worth the sacrifice? Telling people that these
are natural feelings will enable them to process their grief for
their old selves and lives. For many the emptiness of the “Neutral
Zone” is where they hear God most clearly. It is where they know
that they are on the right path. In this painful and questioning
time we must be prepared to be with the person in transition.
Its about Dwelling
When Jesus became flesh and dwelt among us he gave us the
standard for our involvement in others lives. We must be willing to
dwell in the lives of others when they are at their most vulnerable.
We must dwell with them when they are on the verge of going back to
where they came. Dwelling among others is the call of anyone who
accepts Christ and his call in their lives. To use that dwelling as
a vehicle of judgment and insensitivity-not allowing mourning over a
previous life-we deny God. It is easy for us to look at the pain and
questioning of a person in transition to God as negative. It is much
easier to tell them to suck it up and celebrate the new life they
now have. It is easier to let my own insecurity and doubt to be
expressed as impatience. Impatience that disallows the other person
to make peace with the loss they are experiencing. It is in the
empty time of the “Neutral Zone” that God will meet a person and
show them the truth of what they have done. We must be there with
that person with a language of compassion and patience. It is only
then that the person will be able to see the power of what is taking
place within them. It is then that they will begin to see the new
home that God is calling them toward.
During each of our lives before and after we know God we
experience times when it all seems right. Those times can come in
the “Neutral Zone” and we must be there with the person in
transition. In those times when we glimpse a vision of truth we must
have others to share it with if we are to experience its fullness.
It is in this experience that we begin to imagine our new home. This
place is where we will heal and finish the transforming work of God
in our life. Salvation is such a powerful gift from God that we must
sacrifice all we were prior to accepting it if we are to allow its
work to be fulfilled in our new lives.
Bridges calls it making a “New Beginning.” God calls it the peace
that surpasses all understanding. The only way we can understand the
totality of what God is doing in our lives is if we are allowed to
mourn and let go of our past. The new creations that we become will
never be fully rid of what they once were and if we allow that image
of the past to be denied the cost can be great. For many people who
journey toward God the break with the past was never allowed to be
completed. In our effort to show someone the value of what they have
been given we tell them that their past life was ugly and now
forbidden. We were never created to have neat manageable lives. God
has created us with freewill and in that creating has allowed us to
experience both negative and positive aspects of life. If we-through
our own fear-refuse to let a person coming to God remember and use
their history we disconnect them from the truth of who they were
created to be. In a postmodern world that wants authentic
expressions of faith we must be willing to allow people who come to
God to leave their past with positive and meaningful reflection. If
that means we must learn to allow a time of mourning for the life
that has been given up to follow Christ so be it.
When we hear God’s call to follow we must be allowed to deal with
our history in a way that will make our understanding of our new
home real. When Moses lead the people out of Egypt they were
separated from the world that they knew without a time to grieve.
This may be part of the reason that they desired to return to Egypt
when things got tough. When a person hears God and responds to his
call they are like the Israelites leaving Egypt. The life they must
give up is the land of Goshen. The life they leave behind is a life
of slavery and oppression. But we must never tell a person that the
life they leave is worthless.
When the Israelites saw their chance for freedom they knew deep
in their hearts that it was what God had promised Abraham. Yet, they
had been investing themselves in a system that we see as restrictive
and dangerous. Even though they lived their lives as slaves they
still survived in a secure and known environment. When they left and
were faced with the unknown they wanted their old lives. This is the
same doubt and fear people who come to God from a faithless history
will experience. A person who is trying to answer God’s call wants
to return to the world that they knew. When God’s call becomes
clearer in the solitude and pain of the “Neutral Zone” they
naturally revert to the security of a known world. The Israelites
were never allowed a time to mourn the loss of their oppressive
existence in Egypt. They left their controlled and fearless lives
for a place that no one knew. Where was this place Moses had been
called to lead them to. It was in the Wilderness when they allowed
their fear to overcome them and they built the calf that they had
finally begun to see the new home God had prepared for them.
However, there were many things to be dealt with before they could
experience that home.
The person who is trying to fulfill God’s call and understand and
embody a salvific lifestyle must be allowed to process and be
transformed. Just as the Israelites wanted to go back and then once
aware that they could not attempted to recreate a world they knew
that person will want the same. This desire to turn back and
recreate will be increased if we refuse to allow the power of
solitude and pain to do its work. Leighton Ford once said, “solitude
is the furnace of transformation.” In the quiet and pain filled
world between our two homes we must be allowed to mourn and
celebrate at the same time. In our mourning and celebration we open
ourselves to the transforming power of God.
Once the Israelites had dealt with their past in the way God
prescribed they could see the image of their new home. They had to
rid themselves of their old lives and begin to see the world God had
created for them. Once the ones who denied the mourning of the old
life were gone those remaining were open to hear, see and know their
new home. The Israelites went through the process Bridges describes
in Transitions. Leaving Egypt, wandering in the wilderness
and taking the new land where the same process that any person who
comes to Christ must experience. Just as the Israelites wanted to go
back so will those that seek Christ. Just as the Israelites built a
calf to assail their fear so will those who seek Christ. When we
dwell with people through the pain of ending and the transformation
of the “Neutral Zone” we must create a space where fears can be
expressed. That space must be a place of safety and security, a
place where questions are answered with compassion and honesty, a
place where God is allowed to work. When we demand that people
ascend to a standard or image that we create we will be responsible
if they fail. The people who are entering the transition for old to
new life don’t know what the Promised Land looks like. They think a
land of milk and honey means everything will be wonderful. We-the
ones who already dwell in the land-must tell those seeking it that
it is a place of pain and joy. We must never tell them that the life
they left is unimportant and valueless. It was in the life that they
just left that they encountered God. Each of them was created to
dwell in the new land and we must be the ones who help them occupy
their new home.
When Joshua lead Israel into Canaan there was still much work to
be done. It was not until the past had been let go of and mourned
that the land could be called home. As our world struggles to
understand itself and what postmodernism really means, we as
followers called to reach out to others must open ourselves to God’s
leading. Just as the world has been made new from the tidal wave of
postmodernism the church must help those who God is calling, mourn
where they have come from and at the same time celebrate where they
are headed. Israel always struggled with their understanding of
where they had come. Yet, they always knew that it was God who had
delivered them from lives of death. It is that understanding that we
must help those seeking God to understand. The lives they leave are
of value and the cost to leave them is great. We must be about the
business of teaching those seeking God that we value their
sacrifice. We must help them gain the tools to mourn the life they
are sacrificing to follow Christ. In that teaching we will
experience God in ways we never imagined possible.
In our quest to make disciples of all nations we must learn a new
language. That language is one that values the lives people leave,
the sacrifices they make, the cost they pay to answer the call of
God in their life. Speaking this language will allow the power of
God to be experienced in ways that will transform those learning and
those teaching. When we are able to value the importance of change
and the transition that change brings in the journey toward God we
will be fulfilling the work of Christ in each of us. When God
created he intended that we be complex and confusing creatures. When
we seek to control and quantify people in ways that were never
intended we destroy the natural process of change. Change is part of
God’s design. Understanding how change enables and disables people
is essential to the task of leadership. Seeing salvation as a gift
that does have costs allows us to experience change the way God
intended. Demanding that a person ignore or destroy their
understanding of the costs involved risks the transformative work of
salvation. When we understand our work as followers of Christ as one
of dwelling in the lives of others we will be more open to see the
truth. God wants us to experience salvation in a way that allows us
to understand its costs. We must learn to celebrate the lives we
left as places where God has done incredible things. In all of those
lives we have learned lessons that we will use to reach others. In
our reaching out to our future we must be willing to mourn and
celebrate our pasts. It is in a clear understanding of what we left
and what it cost that we can understand the cost to God to reconcile
all of us to him. God risks everything in the hope that all his
children would accept the challenge. We must also risk everything in
our following and dwell among God’s people with honesty and
compassion. Then we will understand the words of the Unicorn in C.
S. Lewis’ The Last Battle’s chapter Further Up and Further In,
“I have come home at last! This is my real country! I belong here.
This is the land I have been looking for all my life, though I never
knew it till now. The reason we loved the old Narnia is that it
sometimes looked a little like this. Bree-hhe-hhe! Come further up,
come further in.”
Notes
William Bridges, Transitions: Making Sense of Life's Changes
(Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1980)
C. S. Lewis, The Last Battle (New York: Harper Collins,
1956), 196.