| |
When
I was growing up my brothers and sisters and I were very active
in family. Our parents were both family-going people, so from the
day my brother and I were born we, too, went to family. Our family
had a really good, full-time caretaker. He provided us with so many
wonderful events and activities that made us want to keep coming
to family. Every first day of the week we would all get dressed
up and go to family. On that day we would spend 2 to 3 hours at
family, mostly for the purpose of listening to the caretaker tell
us about the family Book. The Book was available for all of my brothers
and sisters and me to read and enjoy on our own, but we always felt
we got enough understanding of it by listening to the family caretaker.
Besides, he knew it better than any of us anyway; he was a professional
family caretaker. On "family day" we would also get to see other
people who we didn't normally see very much throughout the week.
Everyone was always very cordial and pleasant, and it was always
exciting to see new and different faces at the family meeting. This
especially pleased the caretaker. After awhile it almost appeared
that it was the goal of the family to have more family members,
or at least to have more people come to the family meeting on the
first day of the week.
In
my town, there were several different families. All them were very
diverse. They looked different. They talked differently. They did
different things. We never associated a whole lot with these other
families. Now and then someone might get upset with their own family
and go and visit another one, or vice versa. Whenever that happened
it always made the caretaker nervous, and he usually would want
to meet with that family member to make sure everything was okay.
But sometimes we lost some family members to other families in town.
But we also gained some family members from other families in town.
This was especially true as our family grew larger and began to
provide more activities and events. We were very proud to be part
of the biggest and best family in town.
One
thing I never quite understood about the family was how it was structured.
Instead of being chosen for tasks and functions according to what
we were gifted to do, our brothers and sisters (well, mostly just
brothers) were voted to these roles by the other family members.
Then the selected, or "elected," leaders of the family would get
together once a month to discuss how the family budget would be
spent. This often turned into an very grueling and stressful process
for the caretaker. No one ever really knew the reality of what went
on in those meetings, especially in the heart of the caretaker.
He spent long hours at the family (often the building in which the
family met would also be called the family, this was confusing at
first, but after awhile you get used to it), in his office preparing
proposals for the family leaders, hoping they would all one day
catch his vision for the family.
Another
very strange thing about our family was the family meal. This was
probably the most bizarre event of all family events. First of all,
it was hardly ever a meal. Every now and then, say once a month,
we would all share a real meal together, usually after the family
meeting. But the weekly meal was more of a ritual. There's no doubt
it was for a special purpose, and had much meaning. But it was the
only meal I ever had where I wasn't allowed to talk to anyone beside
me, or even look at anyone beside me for that matter. There was
always music played for the meal, but it was very solemn, almost
funeral-like music. This was the one part of our family meetings
that I always felt had much more potential to bring the family together
as a unified group of people who loved one another. Meals usually
always do that everywhere else. What better place to have that happen
than in a family?
I
always thought one of the most difficult jobs anyone could ever
have would be a caretaker. It had to be a difficult task trying
to help people of the family understand how to be a good family
member and share the work of the family, especially when this "persuasion"
had to be done primarily during the 30 minute talk the caretaker
would always give in the family meeting on the fist day of the week
(he had to be sure his talk was no more than 30 minutes, because
if it went any longer some of the "key" family members might get
angry and leave the family... which meant they would no longer be
giving money to our family... this seemed to be a common fear of
the family). It was very important to try to keep all the family
members happy. And this was the caretaker's job. If he wasn't able
to do his job, then the family would simply have to find another
caretaker. If someone in the family was sick and in the hospital,
it wasn't the brothers' and sisters' responsibility to go and visit
that family member, it was the caretaker's. If someone in the family
was going through a rough time, they made appointments to talk to
the caretaker. In reality, much of the family weight was carried
on the shoulders of the caretaker. This was probably why one of
the first questions a person might ask when inquiring about our
family was, "Who's your caretaker?" Of course it was always followed
or preceded by this question, "How many is your family running now?"
These seemed to be the most important questions about the family.
No matter where you went, those were the two questions you were
most likely asked by members of another family.
Whenever
my brothers and sisters and I would get frustrated with our family
we would usually complain about it, and talk about what we would
do differently in the family. On a couple occasions we went to visit
another family. It was a lot weirder than our family. They were
organized much differently, and the caretaker was not like ours.
It quickly became obvious to me that it is hard to find the perfect
family.
I
am now at the place in my life when I look back over all my family-going
years, and I am thankful for where I have been, and what I have
received from many other very special family members and caretakers.
But it seems strange to me, this concept of "GOING to family." It
almost doesn't even make any since. How can one GO to family? Obviously
it is possible because I did it for years, and thousands of people
still do it today. But is it what was originally intended for the
family? Did the Creator of the family intend for His Family to consist
of a meeting on the first day of the week, which is led by a caretaker
and a few others? Did the Creator of the family intend for a major
portion of our time, energy, and resources to go toward building
big family buildings? And why is it that some family members seem
more important than others? I know no one would ever admit that
out loud, but it just seems weird that so many family members never
do anything except come to the family meetings at the family on
the first day of the week. Maybe I should go check out one of those
new "postmodern" families. I'll bet they know how to do family right.
Who knows? Maybe "GOING TO FAMILY" is a dying concept altogether,
and the family is now finally learning how to BE the family, function
as a family, and grow as a family after all. It certainly sounds
more natural. Many of our first-ever family members would probably
wonder about my grammar skills if they heard me saying things like
"going to family" or, "See you at family this week." What does that
mean anyway?
|