|

“Please God may I catch this fly ball…”
You are playing outfield for the Heaven Defense Department softball
team. God himself is at the plate; for the sake of your own limited
imagination, he’s taken the form of a sort-of mid-millennial
Anglo-Saxon long-hair-with-a-robe kind-of guy. There you stand,
center field, and a stomach-churning feeling of impending doom comes
over you-He’s going to hit it straight to you.
You’ve caught this ball before, you know. There was the time when
God took you out to the field, when no one else was there, and
popped them out to you one after another. You watched them
beautifully sail through the atmosphere, placed yourself under their
apparent path of decrement, and caught them as they fell into your
open hands.
But here you are, at the big game. You see God at the plate. He’s
swinging. The ball is sent starward with a harmonic crack and it
begins its perfect arc toward YOU.
Suddenly, your coaches are all about you. The first base coach
stands ten yards to your left, shouting, “Stand here! The ball is
going to come down here!” The team manager shouts encouragement from
behind you: “Just step back a few feet, hold your hands up, and get
ready!” The third base coach is sending you signals; it looks like
he’s trying to act out what you should do...
Thunk. The ball lands behind you...
There is a phenomenon in this country right now, known as “praise
and worship”. This
Christian fascination is not without its price: all across this
great nation of ours, people are flocking to concerts, picking up
CDs, and otherwise (*ahem*) singing the praises and filling the
coffers of praise and worship music’s select. There is a hunger, an
intense hunger, for the “worship experience,” and those trained in
the musical creation of such experiences have found themselves with
plenty of employment lately... Unfortunately, as it has become with
most things in the modern church, music has become a victim of the
church’s loving embrace with modernist philosophy. Worship music has
become formulistic, predictable and secure in its execution---making
the typical “worship experience” very stale, rote, and anesthetic
(this from the movement first begun in response to the “boring”
liturgies of “old” church).
Most tragic of all is the compartmentalization that has occurred
around not just worship music, but also our entire experience of
God. God has become someone we meet only on Wednesday nights and
Sunday mornings (Saturday nights if we’re hip), and the goosebumps-up-the-arms
take-my-breath-away God has become available to us only within the
context of the evangelical music event. Should our encounter with
such an event be disrupted by our schedules, or worse yet, a
talkative couple in front of us, we will miss out on God. The bush
was a-burnin’ up on the mountain, but we missed the tram ride to the
top.
But before we jump right to the end of this story, let’s look at
where we have been. First, by way of definition: what do we exactly
mean by “praise and worship?” Do we mean the experience of God? The
liturgical order of worship? The holy of holies? No. We mean,
literally, praise and worship music. Praise and worship music is
primarily a style of music. It is often referred to as “choral”
music because of its trait of having oft repeated “chorus”
sections-short, easily sung parts of a song. Many times new music is
kept out of the church canon simply because it does not fit into the
understood style of “P&W.” Recent attempts by contemporary P&W
artists, like Delirious and Sonic Flood, to update P&W’s relevancy
to popular music have been accepted with open arms by a church
culture finally ready to add a modern feel to their P&W (never mind
that groups like The Choir were creating modern liturgies a decade
ago). However it is important to observe the constancy of style that
exists even within the “modern” P&W “movement.” This is because
there is, in fact, a theological and philosophical root to our
contemporary praise and worship of God that threatens to bury church
worship experience forever in pretension and irrelevance.
The common
myth perpetuating the praise and worship music phenomena is that of
the “sacred” versus the “secular;”
that is, that there are segments of our lives more holy, sacred, and
set apart for God than others-in this case, the praise and worship
music service, specifically. As long as this ideology continues to
steer the church at large, our worship of God will remain no more
than a distant affair wrapped in the best of intentions.
What are the reasons for the current segmentation? Why is it wrong
to believe in such compartmentalization?
There are many examples of biblical texts that have been used to
support such a worldview, many of them condemning any activities of
the “world”. For example, James warns, “You adulteresses, do you not
know that friendship with the world is hostility toward God?
Therefore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself
an enemy of God.” (James 4:4) The issue here is certainly not the
validity of James’ statement, but rather the exact definition of
“the world”. In modern times, the world has been defined to be
anything outside of western Christian culture. It is easy to surmise
that James had no such concept as “Christian culture,” let alone
that which is represented by western Christians today. How did
Scriptural statements such as this one become to be known as tenets
of a sub-cultural phenomena rather than spiritual encouragements, or
at worst, admonishments?
It is possible that many of us have fallen into the trap of using
Scripture to support our already existing world view, as opposed to
allowing Scripture, in the words of Mike Riddell, “to do [its]
radical work among us” (from Threshold of the Future, SPCK:
1998). Much due to the Enlightenment, we have allowed a type of
cerebral idolatry to mark our world and God view. The Enlightenment
certainly is not the only development to influence our modern
outlook: Darwinism has also given our faith a utilitarian tinge:
“Something happened in the secular world which then deeply
affected and infiltrated the Christian church. Following the
Darwinian theory of evolution...people began to look at
themselves and the world around them in purely utilitarian
terms.” (Scheaffer, Franky. Addicted to Mediocrity,
Crossway: 1981)
{modern philosophy:
as with most philosophies, very difficult to pin down, however as
adopted by the religious mainstream and as referenced by this
discussion, marked by utilitarianism and a high esteem for the
ability of man to dissect and understand his surroundings, creating
steadfast forms and truth models designed to withstand the ages’
scrutiny (and thus being beyond scrutiny)}
The dominant Christian philosophy of the 20th century,
modernism, is in some respects an intertwining of these two threads.
It is this cord in particular that has led the church, and
subsequently its art and music, by the neck for countless years. It
has caused our worship of God to become segmented apart from the
rest of our daily existence. We must allow Him back in.
This cord of intellectualism and utilitarianism has been twisted
tighter and tighter throughout our world’s culture by such
ideologies as Freudianism, Marxism, McCarthyism, the Cultural
Revolution, and effected some of the most rapid change history had
theretofore ever known: the industrial and technical revolutions. It
has also resulted in the dominant philosophy of modernism, and the
dominant Christian-cultural outlook of Evangelicalism. 20th Century
Christianity did not oppose modernism or liberalism, but rather
stuck its arrow in the same fire. It adopted the same basic creeds
of the need for intellectual rigor and laborious usefulness in any
endeavor. The Bible became a reference for debate, much like the
Encyclopedia Britannica or your statistics textbook; science became
a tool to reveal the truth, and masters of Bible-idolic data
manipulation looked very much like the university researchers, using
creative statistics to prove points and thereby gain more monies;
and music and spiritual experience became sterilized and
compartmentalized. Sunday-morning-ish music could be spiritual, in
the right context (certainly on Sunday morning); pop music was
sensual (Lord knowing sex is no proper subject for a religious
person to breach); rock music was borderline devil worship (with its
gothic undertones and association with marginalized culture); and
college radio was spurning rebellion in the very places our young
people should be learning to defend God’s word!
The very faith which was once such a major contributor to culture
sank into sub-cultural irrelevance through fear and intimidation;
but mostly because those who desired to uphold their faith against
the fire of the “world” did so with the same fire that threatened
the thatch which had been built over hundreds of years by saints and
artisans such as Francis, Beethoven, King Jr., Dylan. Our beliefs,
and the music which represented them, was separated from real life
and real culture, and left in the ghetto for dead.
Postmodernism, in contrast to what many church leaders try to
characterize it as, is simply that which has come after modernism.
Postmodernism is just the waking up, the rubbing of the eyes, the
squinting at the light that is sneaking through the curtains. Some
light needs to be shed on our spiritual experience; and there are
many places in which to find some illumination.
There are some historical precedents against said segmentation.
Two very popular Bible figures are, in fact, among the most
subversive of all historical persons: King David of Israel and Jesus
of Nazareth. The classic story of David dancing in his undies always
puts a smile on my face (2 Samuel 6:14-16). His shameless joy put a
frown on at least one contemptuous observer then, and I imagine it
would do the same within the presence of Christians of today. Jesus
was of course the most seditious of all, delivering a message that
flew in the face of centuries’ thought. Can you imagine how quickly
the ushers would carry out someone overturning the ministry tables
so common in the lobbies of our own vast temples-a poor, wild-eyed
Jew gripped on each arm by large men in suits? (Matthew 21:12) Both
men held back nothing from their faith-filled lives, living at once
munificent and terrible existences-a great difference from modern
Christians, who, after putting on a face to even go to church,
experience a worship event once there that looks nothing like
anything else in God’s great Earth.
Praise and worship, as a segmented and process-driven event,
suffers futility -it fails
to reflect real life, but instead promotes pride, isolation,
individuality, and a limited experience of God. To become again
relevant, humiliating, uniting, and awesome, our worship of God must
integrate our entire lives; it must involve our communities and our
day-to-day experience. The fact is that there is nothing more
spiritual about your Sunday morning service than there is about a
Sting or Pearl Jam concert. In fact, elements of performance such as
Eddie Vedder’s writing “Pro Choice” across his arm or Rage Against
The Machine’s standing silent on stage, wearing nothing but duct
tape over their mouths, involve more spiritual interaction with
congregants than your typical worship leader ranting “Everybody
now!” Typically such acts both understand what they are
communicating and how to communicate it with vigor, engagement, and
creativity-much more so than acts in the P&W genre. It seems the
Spirit has been working with a great deal of efficacy in the very
places we have been isolating ourselves from.
Praise and worship music, even just by its intentions, is the
most presumptuous and inauthentic art in existence today. There are
two specific reasons for this: First, as Dr. Bilezikian of Wheaton
College writes in Community 101, “Corporate worship is not
just quantitatively different from private devotions...it is
qualitatively different.” Songs written for the praise and worship
genre have been traditionally written from one of two emotional
places: that of individual devotion and longing for Christ, or that
of scientifically creating works for the expressed purpose of
eliciting an emotional response from a Christian congregation. When
brought into the group setting, the former loses its authenticity in
trying to become for many what was only meant for one, the latter,
while inauthentic to start with, becomes something much more dark in
nature when that elicited emotional response is chalked up to
something more than the calculated production that it is.
The second driver behind worship music’s slip into insincerity is
closely linked to that very last point, and is the very essence of
this entire story. That is, unified awe-experience of God cannot
be segmented from the rest of a person’s journey; it cannot be a
sacred moment reserved for church auditoriums and Christian concert
halls; it must be part of the very marrow of life. Tearing the
emotive experience of God away from life is akin to tearing away a
joint ligament from its bone: the limb remains intact visibly, but
its functionality is all but ruined.
We’ve been standing in the mud for so long, our pants, our shoes,
our socks are soaked in it. It squishes in-between our toes when we
try to move. But move we must.
First, we
must get worship away from form.
God, and his worship, are mysterious, complicated, beyond our human
understanding. We can certainly hope for a glimpse, a glimmer, a
goose bump, a gasp of thin air. But we cannot continue to pursue Him
week in and week out from within the same form and the same
boundaries.
“...Too many church services don’t inspire reverence or awe.
And so we turn elsewhere to encounter something awe-ful,
something that puts us back into a truer perspective as a
creature ourselves. Too often, in church, we feel like the
centre of the event. Our needs are emphasized, our concerns are
apparently addressed, our feelings, moods, worries and yearnings
are the most important things that drive the agenda. And we’re
sick of it! We desire a worship experience that takes our breath
away!” (Frost, Michael, Eyes Wide Open, Albatross: 1998)
We must assimilate worship and real life; we must see God in the
ordinary, in our normal daily experience. He is there and his Spirit
is at work. It’s not just an unrealistic cliché. It is real and it
is possible to understand. Begin with the arts, and observe the
Spirit speaking, not only through Christians to Christians, but
through all people to all people. If we choose, we may be so
privileged as to see his breath, to experience his worship, to drink
of his life.
Once one’s experience of God gets out of its box, it is possible to
re-introduce common gatherings as a place for worship. “It’s
impossible to avoid the forms of the past. What is important are the
meanings of today.” (Josh Spencer, StrangerThingsMag.com,
Jan-Feb 2001) The “stimulat[ing] one another to love...assembling
together,” as the Scriptures put it (Hebrews 10:24-25), is a very
important time for social interaction, spiritual connection and
encouragement. We are traveling across a mostly barren and often
dangerous landscape-we frequently need to stop and circle the
wagons. Certainly art and unified awe-experience of God must be
central to this event. However, the presentation of that art and the
actualization of that experience cannot come from within the limits
of the P&W genre exclusively.
There are many hopeful glimpses to be found, once one has
traveled to the edge and peered over the end of this flat world.
Those who have stepped over have found that the universe does not
end at the horizon. The horizon just keeps going, forever out of
reach, forever calling us to pursue it. Set sail out past the sight
of land, breathe deep, and hope against hope for your breath to be
taken away.
|
music
|
Daniel
Miller is a graduate of the University of Arizona with a BS
in Psychology. He is a computer software trainer married to
Miriam. His ministry focus is "to increase worship's
availability, potency, authenticity, creativity and to move it
away from process and toward real life...simply, to have our
breath taken away."
www.hopeagainsthope.com |
Click
here
to respond to this article. Click here
to discuss this article on the Next-Wave Discussion page.
[^ Back to
top]
|
|