) come close to tears
in a business seminar he was facilitating describing how North
Americans have virtually lost their capacity to have a
meaningful conversation.
There are many factors that contribute to this; I’ll mention
two.
I’ve lived in the Washington/Baltimore corridor for the last
13 years; people here - and in many parts of the country - are
mind-bogglingly busy. People of accomplishment are striving to
accomplish too much or, in the alternative, throwing all of
their resources at accomplishing one thing with a monomaniacal
focus. Either too many goals or too much focus on one goal have
the same result: a loss of stability in other areas of life,
whether it be family, or work, or your body, or church. And I’m
not talking about seasons of chosen imbalance; everyone has
those - whether it’s the purchase of a house, the birth of new
baby, or getting a start-up off the ground and into
profitability. I’m talking about something that’s become
routinized.
Another timekiller that effects what little discretionary
time these folk have left and totally dominates the lives of
those who are bored, burned out, or have given up is an
overindulgence in the constant stream of entertainment that
bombards us from media sources.
These factors and others rob us of our lives; they also rob
us of one another. And they are perfectly natural to the extent
that we believe that what we see is all we have and that
everything around us is all there is. In other words, people of
time must live differently because they must accumulate and then
horde all the resources they will eventually lose. Christians
are people of time and of eternity. They are right-now
and forever people. They can afford to live at a more measured
pace because they have a different agenda and a treasure
elsewhere.
Unfortunately, forever people increasingly live as if they
also are trapped by time. But not those who understand joy.
We often hear - as our Lord taught - that our two highest
responsibilities are to love God will all that is within and to
love those beside us as we love ourselves. What is not heard as
often - but was understood by folk like Augustine and CS Lewis -
is that the fulfilling of our highest responsibilities is the
path to our highest joy.
This intoxicating joy in the One at whose right hand there
are pleasures forever (Psalm 16:11) helps us - to modify a
Pauline phrase - to cast aside the light and momentary pleasures
that would distract us. And the apostle reveals where else he
found joy when we remarked, “How can we thank God enough for you
in return for all the joy we have in the presence of our God
because of you?” (1 Thessalonians 3:9, emphasis mine)
So I could superficially answer the question that what we
need is a new sense of time. But that wouldn’t address the heart
of the matter: What’s the most important issue facing this
generation? a new vision of God. We need to drink deep drafts of
who He is and lose ourselves in His wonder, enraptured by his
love and magnificence. That will then drive our agenda because,
like Paul, we’ll be able to say that the love of Christ
constrains us. Our PIMs will submit to his passion.
what do you think the church can do to help us face this
issue?
First of all, those of us who are leaders have to make sure we
are enjoying God and others more than anything. One of the
greatest competitors for our passion is the ministry itself. And
I think it’s because it’s more controllable. God and people are
unpredictable, but my three point sermon with a joke isn’t. And
- truth in advertising here - I struggle with this quite a bit.
When I first began working with small groups at Cedar Ridge
Community Church I focused quite a bit on structure and systems.
But toward the end of my time there I had come to the point
where I felt that my most important activity was going out to
lunch with my core leaders. We leaders must model a
preeminent enjoyment of God and others if we want to see
multiplying spiritual friendships in our communities.
That’s the hardest thing. Be examples.
Next - and this is easier for us preachers to accomplish - we
need to cast a vision. We have to use the power of our stages to
create a new corporate culture, a culture where spiritual
friendships are exalted, celebrated, and described. This is
weird for us because perhaps more than at any other time in
history we live individual lives.
And that culture must also include a core value on - now get
ready for this one - a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.
That vertical relationship empowers the horizontal. But that
phrase typically is collapsed to an initial salvific event. We
have to help people to understand the normality, regularity, and
mundane nature of relationship with the Divine. The great
Christian mystic Leanne Payne calls it walking alongside of God
instead of walking alongside ourselves. I can’t tell you how
common it is for me to walk alongside myself instead of walking
with Jesus. And when I do that, I’m living a sad superficial
life and am usually escaping some fear.
When I walk with Jesus, on the other hand, I walk in confident
power. “He makes my feet like the feet of a deer; he enables me
to stand on the heights” (Psalm 18:33, NIV). The only thing I do
have going for me is that I’m hungry for that and I
believe what my Lord said that those who hunger and thirst for
righteousness will be satisfied.
The classic spiritual disciplines are paths to this. I like the
way that Dallas Willard describes the disciplines: They are very
intentional ways that we put ourselves into places where we can
receive the grace and power of God.
Finally, we have to realize that this Christian community thing
isn’t about Sunday morning services. For all the good that it’s
brought and for all the new people that have been reached, one
of the weights of the seeker-sensitive model is the enormous
effort and time that have to be focused on the Sunday morning
service. Now I’m not sure now we can ever go back, though the
house church movement seems to be picking up quite a bit. But we
need something else. I’m now reading George Stephanopoulos’
All Too Human and I’ve been so mesmerized by Hegedus and
Pennebaker’s masterful documentary of the 1992 Clinton campaign
- The War Room - that I’ve probably seen it like five times. One
of things that Stephanopoulos reminded me of that I had seen in
the documentary was a whiteboard that James Carville (who was in
charge of the campaign) had placed in the war room. I’ll quote
Stephanopoulos:
“It said:
Change vs. More of the Same
The economy, stupid
Don’t forget health care
…James drilled it into our heads, and every speech,
every event, every attack, and every response had to reflect
one of these three commandments”
(p. 88).
Irrespective of what we might think of the Clinton agenda and
legacy, that campaign was disciplined with a laser-like focus on
these three themes. Everything they did served these three
themes.
Those of us who led churches need to exercise a similar
discipline focused on the fact that every program, every
service, every bulletin announcement, every activity must be
about helping others love God more perfectly and one another. We
have to keep our eyes on the ball. That, as they say, is the
money. We have to remember that church doesn’t happen primarily
when we deliver a sermon - church happens at 2 AM in the morning
when someone picks up the phone and hears, “You said call you
anytime? Listen I’m about to walk out the door to score but I
don’t want to.” That’s church. We must do everything we can to
create an environment where these love actions occur - both
those heading up and those heading to the side. If we create
labs where the miracle can happen, God will create the miracle.
Truth is He does it anyway.
3) what do you see as the value of church multiplication, and
apposed to church growth?
Life begets life. If we are celebrating and nurturing spiritual
friendships, spiritual folk will naturally reach out to those
who are around them. And growth will occur, both in terms of
deepening roots and numbers. And so much joy and friendship will
be infectious to others who will want to work themselves in.
It’s a false dichotomy to emphasize one or the other. Is
it Senge or Covey who talks about the genius of the “and” versus
the tyranny of the “or?”
4) what is "faith mapping?"
I like the way you made the term “faithmap” into a verb! That
captures much of its essence. “Faithmaps” is a term I started
using as a way of making a statement about systematic theology,
ecclesiology and praxis. I, and many others, have been concerned
that modernity has had an inordinate effect on evangelical
theological reflection. Many believe that this entered the North
American church through the influence of Scottish Common Sense
Realism on the Old Princeton guys like BB Warfield, Charles
Hodge, etc. I think that might be simplistic, and I’m not yet
prepared to trash Thomas Reid (considered one of the key players
in CS Realism), but my own experience has given me a sense that
we’ve overemphasized information. As I’ve expressed
to get some contact information for a new business partnership we
launched this evening and she told me that she had intended to call
me. She works for USA TODAY’s parent company Gannett and though
we’ve been acquainted for years, we don’t typically interface.. But
she had been told that I was diabetic and had learned to regulate my
blood sugar to normal levels by diet and exercise without pills or
insulin. We had a highly charged, energetic conversation for about
15 mins before I had to leave for an appointment. But I encouraged
her to contact me for a lunch meeting. She was terribly hungry for
information, being terrified at her recent diagnosis (diabetes is
the 7th biggest killer in the United States) and I was highly
motivated to share with another diabetic how they too might achieve
normal blood sugars through a change in diet and a commitment to
exercise. Many times I feel that diabetes is one of the best things
that’s ever happened to my health because of all the healthy
patterns I must follow to regulate it. And I love giving a fearful
person hope.
As I was reflecting later on how charged and, frankly, exciting
our conversation was, I realized that I had become an evangelist for
a highly proactive response to diabetes.
The excitement that new families share when they move into a new
development bond them together. The threat of death and my
excitement at finding a path to life thru that threat created an
instant bond between my new friend and myself today.
It seems to me that this is what church should be about. We
gather because of a shared experience of Jesus Christ. That binds us
together in a highly energetic way. If it doesn’t, then it means
that we have yet to see the broad vista of God’s magnificence. When
we catch but a glimpse of Who He is, our excitement will become
infectious and others who are hungry will be moved to ask us for the
reason for the hope we have. When that doesn’t happen - quite simply
- it means that we aren’t seeing Jesus for all that He is.
6) what is the most important ingredient in a church mix?
I’ll answer in terms of tangible behavior: Recurrent spiritual
conversations in the context of deepening spiritual friendships
working its way out in missional activity.
7) if you were the lead of a new work what would you see as being
important?
the quality of the friendships I have with my co-leaders. The
community that we wish to create will be reflective of the community
we experience.
closing thoughts:
I’m grateful for this opportunity to share.
Let us be “fixing our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of
faith” (Hebrews 12:2a, NASB).