|
Home
| Back | Next |
It is
subtle how we inherit our culture and incorporate it into the
church. Ideas creep in, and before we know it, cultural
norms replace kingdom norms. Our Western worldview is one that links
formality with importance. One only has to look back to the
Victorian era with its pomp and ceremony to see where it came from.
Dress it up, throw in grand music, set the atmosphere and scene, and
you have the makings of a formal ceremony that carries great
importance.
In the church, we
have adopted almost the opposite viewpoint, namely that if it's not
formal it's not important. As the church, and certainly not in the
post-charismatic movement, would we
confess to consciously subscribing to that idea ---
however I believe that a careful look reveals that we have indeed
inherited this worldview. We have linked formality to importance and
have blended the two until they have become inseparable. Thus, if we
meet as the church in an informal setting, it can be seen as less
important than a meeting that may have taken place formally.
If we
think about life, we realize
just how narrow this world view and perception is; our formal
education is based upon a formal "lecturing" system, but how much
does that really contribute toward what we know? Sure, we learn
about facts; we can name the capital of this country or learn the
skills for a job - but formal knowledge by and large does not equip
us to deal with the challenges that life confronts us with. And this
is where the crux is - the church living as the expression of Christ
on earth does not really need to know that the capital of Honduras
is Tegucigulpa, but certainly should know how to love their
neighbour - something not usually taught in a formal setting...
This
concept for me is well set out in Leviticus
11:19, where the Israelites are exhorted to the teach the word of
the Lord; " Teach them to your children, talking about them when you
sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and
when you get up". This is an informal setting described in the
Bible to teach eternal issues.
The
point is that a world view, where knowledge is related to formality
and only that which is formal is important, results in a life where
only a small portion is spent learning about eternal issues.
Some of our most
important and defining moments as individuals take place in the
mundane backdrop of domesticity, where for example the dinner table
can take the place of the most important college, or a cup of coffee
with a friend can bring about a revelation we thought only fitting
at a formal conference.
What
did Jesus model? An examination of His teachings will often show
them to take place in mundane settings, on hillsides, mountains, in
homes, boats and occasionally in the formal setting of the Temple
courtyards. Even when He reveals Himself to the disciples as the
risen Christ, it takes place amidst the informality of a campfire on
a beach - hardly high on the formality rating scale if you were
wanting to influence the lives of men who were about to change the
world. Thus, if we had to subscribe to the worldview that importance
is linked to formality, most of the teachings of Jesus could be
relegated to a footnote in history.
If we
are to successfully shepherd people in the informal backdrop of
homes, streets, shops and any other place that the church should
gather, we need to dispel the myth that the dinner table is not the
setting for the divine, or that the domesticity of our daily lives
cannot hold the ingredients of eternity. |